Evaluation of the 3rd meeting in Skopje, 14-15 Oct 2018

Evaluation of the 3rd meeting in Skopje, 14-15 Oct 2018

Aims of the Skopje meeting:

  1. Presentations on the results of
  • O3 – Syllabus and learning content for AgriTeach 4.0 and
  • O4 – Agriteach 4.0 Learning Management System. Discussion of translation into national languages, distribution of tasks

      2. Starting discussion on O4/A3-A4-A5.

  • A3 Selecting and integration Open Educational Resources,
  • A4 Developing training guides and
  • A5 Training for tutors (BETA test)  

      3. Planning the multiplier events (E1-Hungary, E2-Macedonia) starting pilots - related to O4

      4. O5 – Agriteach 4.0 Further Training Program for VET teachers, planning the pilot for VET teachers in Hungary and Macedonia

      5. Planning the events related to O5, training for teachers Hungary and Macedonia - closing pilot

      6. Planning O6 - Planning for valorisation and sustainability and the multiplier events related to O6

      7. Dissemination activities, publications

      8. QM activities, financial issues

Please give your opinion by completing this short questionnaire.

Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements

1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = don't know ,  4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree

strongly agreeagreedon't knowdisagreestrongly disagree
1. We arrived at the venue without any problems *
2. The meeting was well organised *
3. The meeting objectives were clear *
4. The Coordinator helped to achieve the meeting objectives *
5. There was a cooperative athmosphere at the meeting *
6. Refreshments were of high quality *
7. The meeting room was comfortable and suitable for work *
8. The hosting organisation did a good job *
9. I liked the cultural program *
strongly agreeagreedon't knowdisagreestrongly disagree
10. I am happy with my task allocation for O4, O5 and O6. *
11. The presentation of the Agritech e-learning platform was clear, and the use of the platform is understandable. *
12. I understand all my responsibilities around dissemination and how important to upload regularily. *
13. The dates for the multiplier events in MK and HU were clear and satisfactory for all parties. *
14. The dates for the pilot testing of the teachers in MK and HU were clear and satisfactory for all parties. *
15. I have a knowledge of the financial requirements *
16. I understand the Agreement and I agree with the Agreement for Intellectual Property Rights. *
17. All the objectives on Day 1 were met. *
strongly agreeagreedon't knowdisagreestrongly disagree
18. Discussion on O3 on Module 1 - Teaching in the 21st century was accurate and understandable *
19. Discussion on O3 on Module 2 - European Strategies and Initiatives of E-agriculture was clear and understandable. *
20. Discussion on O3 on Module 3 - Digital systems within Agriculture 4.0 was accurate and understandable. *
21.I am happy with the progress of O3. *
22 I understand clearly what my duties will be in the next project period. *
23. I am happy with the dates of the next meeting in Hungary. *
24. The goals of the second day were achieved *
What issues do you consider should be improved in the planning of the coming transnational meetings?
Please, comment on all those aspects not considered in the questionnaire and/or those aspects you think should be taken into further account.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Fill in the blank.